Showing posts with label Trekster. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Trekster. Show all posts

Wednesday, 5 August 2015

Origins of famous Starfleet ship names


Hi #Treksters
As you well know I love starships!
So I wanted to find a way of writing all about starships without getting all technical on you! 
 
Which is why I wanted to write this blog post all about the origins (and inspiration) for famous Starfleet vessels.
What I am hoping to do in this blog, is explain:
  • Where the ships have appeared in Star Trek cannon (and what they've done).
  • Who or what has inspired the name of the vessel, and the reason they are famous.
    That energised a member of the Star Trek Production team to commission a Starfleet vessel in it's or their honour.
USS Pasteur (NCC-58925) Olympic Class
 
 
The USS Pasteur is an Olympic Class hospital starship seen in 'All Good Things...' the finale for Star Trek: The Next Generation.
She is commanded by Captain Beverly Picard in an anti-time (alternative) future timeline set in the year 2395.
Which has been created by Q, but is unfortunately outgunned and destroyed by two Negh'Var Class Klingon warships.
 

This ship (and a 20th Century counterpart) get their names from famed French microbiologist Louis Pasteur. Who came to fame for various discoveries in healthcare and medicine.
 
 
Most notably in 1864 when he gave the world pasteurisation, a process to kill most of the bacteria that caused spoilage (in beer and wine), preventing these drinks from turning sour.
His other achievements include finding vaccines for smallpox, TB, cholera, and rabies throughout his entire career.
 
 USS Cochrane (NCC-59318) Oberth Class
 
 
The USS Cochrane is an Oberth Class science starship seen in a number of Star Trek: The Next Generation and Star Trek: Deep Space Nine episodes.
That being said, it appears to me as though it becomes affectively a transport ship!
Poor Captain...erm some guy!!!
 
 
It's first appearance is in the Fourth Season episode of Star Trek: The Next Generation in 'The Drumhead' where it transports Admiral Norah Satie to the Enterprise so that she can being her investigation.
Later, the Cochrane gives passage to cadet Wesley Crusher when he goes back to the ship for visit when he's on his Starfleet Academy holiday...but fortunately saves the day once again in 'The Game'.   
 
 
It fairs even worse in Star Trek: Deep Space Nine, as it (briefly) appears in the shows pilot 'Emissary' when it transports a group of Starfleet officers including Doctor Julian Bashir and Lieutenant Commander Jadzia Dax to the newly established Deep Space Nine.
The ship then fought in the Dominion War...but reported numerous casualties to Starfleet Command in 2374. This information was displayed on an Personnel Status Update chart okudagram, in the wardroom in the episode 'In The Pale Moonlight'.
 
 
Unlike the last ship, the USS Cochrane doesn't get it's name from the real world...but from the 'in-universe' (canon) history of Star Trek.
This is because the ship's named after the inventor of Warp Drive...Zefram Cochrane. Which as you already know is also the first Human to travel faster than light (Warp 1).
 
 
He's seen both on the small screen in the Star Trek: The Original Series episode 'Metamorphosis' and on the big screen in Star Trek: First Contact, both encounters take place at different points of Cochrane's life.
 
 
Leading to First Contact being established between Humans and Vulcans. Cochrane achieved both of these impressive accolades on the 5th April 2063 (Star Trek: First Contact). 
In the years which followed those events, lead to the formation of Terran annual holiday of First Contact day. That celebrated humanities entrance into the intergalactic community. By focusing on the 'chance' encounter with the Vulcans.
 
A typical example of First Contact Day festivities is at the beginning of the Star Trek: Voyager episode Homestead, when Neelix decides to throw the crew a themed party!

 
USS Victory (NCC-9754) Constellation Class

 
The USS Victory is a Constellation Class starship seen in the Star Trek: The Next Generation episode 'Elementary, Dear Data'.
Where it rendezvoused with the Enterprise-D at spatial coordinates 3629 by 584, in 2365.
 
After this very fleeting appearance it only got mentioned in a few okudagram's in later episodes of Star Trek: The Next Generation and in Star Trek: Deep Space Nine.
 
Susanna Leijten and Geordi La Forge were assigned to the Victory in the early years of 2360s. When it was tasked with investigating the disappearance of all the Federation colonists on Tarchannen III in 2362.
Five years later in 2367, they later return to Tarchannen III on board the Enterprise-D in the Star Trek: The Next Generation episode 'Identity Crisis'. 
 
 
In the same year (2367), the Victory is named on a Starfleet Operations-Sectors 21166-23079 chart (okudagram) on the Enterprise-D bridge doing a stellar nuclei population survey in the Star Trek: The Next Generation episode 'Brothers'.

Two years after that in 2369, the Victory is still reported to be doing a stellar nuclei population survey...but has moved on to Sectors 21538-23079. When it is seen in another Starfleet Operations chart (okudagram) this time in the Enterprise-D observation lounge, during the Star Trek: The Next Generation episode 'Chain of Command, Part I'.
 
The Victory then fought in the Dominion War...but reported casualties to Starfleet Command in 2374. When the information was displayed on an Personnel Status Update chart okudagram, in the wardroom in the episode 'In The Pale Moonlight'.
(same okudagram as the USS Cochrane [NCC-59318])
 
 
The inspiration for this ship is from one of the most famous navel vessels in British history the HMS Victory, commanded by none other than Vice-Admiral Horatio Nelson (Memory Alpha & Wikipedia pages).
 
 
The ships most infamous battle was with the French at the Battle of Trafalgar in 1805 (Memory Alpha & Wikipedia pages)...where Lord Nelson lost his life.
 
 
This is even referenced in the Star Trek: The Generation Episode 'The Best of Both Worlds, Part I' when Captain Picard tours the Enterprise, and talks to Guinan in Ten Forward about Nelson's tour of the Victory before the Battle of Trafalgar.
Just prior to the ship being forced to leave the Mutara Nebula, leading to a confrontation between them and the Borg Cube.
 
 
A model of the ship is also seen in the aforementioned Star Trek: The Generation Episode 'Elementary, Dear Data'. When Geordi La Forge builds the model so that it can be given to Captain Zimbata...but due to Professor Moriarty's tampering with the Holodeck the model is slightly damaged.
 
But it also fought at numerous other battles like the two battles of Ushant in 1778 and 1781 respectively. It was also at other major engagements including the Battle of Cape Spartel in 1782, and the Battle of Cape St Vincent in 1797.
I'm probably not doing this ship enough justice...as it's just so infamous in British history, so I can only apologise!

 
 USS Gorkon (NCC-40512) Excelsior Class
 

 
The USS Gorkon is a Excelsior Class starship first seen in the Star Trek: The Generation Episode 'Descent, Part I'. Where it is seen as Admiral Nechayev's flagship in charge of an armada, combating a possible renewed Borg invasion.
 
 
The inspiration for this ship, is another historical figure from the 'in-universe' (canon) history of Star Trek.
This time, it's in the form of Chancellor Gorkon from the film Star Trek VI: Undiscovered Country.
 
In Star Trek history he is most known for being one of the 'architects' in starting peace talks between the Klingon Empire and the United Federation of Planets, after the Klingon moon of Praxis explodes (due to excessive mining).
 
 
But before he could reach the peace talks on Earth, he is assassinated by a group of conspirators plotting to stop the peace process. His death results in his daughter (Azetbur) inheriting his position as the Chancellor of the Klingon High Council.
 
 
Who continues her fathers will...she changes the location of the conference to Camp Khitomer for security reasons.
 
The conspirators find out and attempt to assassinate the Federation President. Which fails due to the combined effort of the Enterprise & Excelsior crews.
The Khitomer Conference lead to the signing of the Khitomer Accords, which brings peace between the Klingon Empire and the Federation.

 
USS Mayflower (NCC-1621) 'Abramsverse' Miranda Class
 
 
 
The USS Mayflower is a starship seen in the new 'Abramsverse' Universe. So there isn't much information on it...although it's closest 'Prime Universe' equivalent is that of a Miranda Class starship.
 
 
The Mayflower's only (brief) appearance is seen in the flotilla going to Vulcan at the beginning of Star Trek (XI) from 2009. Where it is later destroyed by Nero's starship (the Narada) at the Battle of Vulcan.


 
The USS Mayflower was named after a ship of the same name (obviously!) called the Mayflower. This is a ship which all our American readers (and listeners) will be familiar with.


As it was the ship responsible for transporting the Pilgrim Fathers from Plymouth (United Kingdom) to Cape Cod (America).
I do however want to point out that there is some controversy over the Mayflowers route to America, as the ship may have docked at Newlyn (United Kingdom). Before heading out into the Atlantic.

Although their arrival at Cape Cod was a 'happy accident'. Due to the fact that they were being blown off course from their original destination of Virginia colony.
This meant that when they arrived at Cape Cod the English could easily strengthen their ability to claim land in North America. As the English had established the settlement of Jamestown in 1607, giving them a foothold on the east coast on America.
This was crucial as Spain had claimed the entire continent (that they called "La Florida"). Which encouraged others (Dutch colonists) to settle in the same region (east coast on America), leading to the formation of the Thirteen Colonies.
If you as me they sound like the Thirteen Tribes from Battlestar Galactica!

I am well informed by a Profession Historian (Ted), that without the Mayflowers arrival in Cape Cod in 1620. We would be 'most likely' be without the Thirteen Colonies.
Which makes me think that the they wouldn't have got their independence in 1783...that wouldn't have sparked the American War of Independence.


Making it possible that we may not have had a 'modern day' America.

Before I move onto the next ship, I would just like to spend a moment to thank Rick & Ted for they're assistance writing about the Mayflower. As I'm sure without the help they provided an awful lot of the facts (and history) would have been totally inaccurate and wrong!
As I was a #ConfusedBrit, while I was researching about the Mayflower!!!

However, if I've (still) made a mistake in my interpretation then let me know...and I will make a change!
 

USS Yeager (NCC-61947) Saber Class
and the
USS Yeager (NCC-65674) Yeager Class
 
The last ship (or ships as it were) is an interesting case, as there is quite a small gap between the production of the two ships (NCC-61947 and NCC-65674).

This 3,727 difference between the registries can be put down to the fact that Starfleet will have wanted to replenish its ships, after losing them against the Borg.
Making it quite unlikely that the USS Yeager will be the only example of Starfleet doing this. In order of replenishing its lost ships with 'updated' (newer class starship) replacements.
 

 
The first USS Yeager is a Saber Class starship (NCC-61947). First seen in the Battle of Sector 001 at the beginning of Star Trek: First Contact, where it is destroyed by the Borg.  



 
It's Yeager Class starship (NCC-65674) replacement, makes it's first appearance in the Star Trek: Deep Space Nine episode 'Doctor Bashir, I Presume' orbiting the station.
The ship also helps retake Deep Space Nine after the Dominion occupation (Operation Return). Then it becomes part of the defence force protecting Deep Space 9 throughout the duration of the war.


Both ships (and the class) get their names from Charles "Chuck" Yeager (Memory Alpha & Wikipedia pages) the famed United States Air Force Test pilot.

Who became the first human to break the sound barrier, on the 14th of October 1947 at the Muroc Army Air Field (now Edwards Air Force Base). When he flew the experimental Bell X-1 at Mach 1 at an altitude of 45,000 ft (13,700 m).





"Chuck", named the Bell X-1 "Glamorous Glennis" after his wife. The plane is now on display at The Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum in Washington DC.
On top of that both can be seen (briefly) in the opening titles of Star Trek: Enterprise.






Star Trek is littered with another three different references to "Chuck" Yeager and his achievement.


The first example of this comes from the Star Trek: Enterprise episode 'Demons'.
When Ensign Travis Mayweather says that he overcame his fear of tense piloting by mimicking Charles Yeager.
Who said; "I never let myself be afraid. I just focus on the dials and concentrate on flying".

Star Trek: The Next Generation also has a some 'subtle' references hidden in a couple of Season Five episodes as well.

Like in the episode 'New Ground' when the Enterprise's Chief Engineer Geordi La Forge said that the upcoming soliton wave test was like "being there to watch "Chuck" Yeager break the sound barrier".


Lastly "Chuck" also had a flight maneuver named after him (Yeager loop), which was mentioned in a bit of dialogue in the episode 'The First Duty'. When the cadets are talking though the display flight plan.
 
I hope you've enjoyed reading my starships blog post, hopefully it has given you an insight into how (over the years) the Star Trek Production team have decided what to name the Starfleet ships seen in the series and subsequent films.
Make sure you look out for the other blog posts being released this month during our Hiatus.

This is Simon from The Engage Podcast signing out!

 


Saturday, 4 April 2015

Simon: Famous Conspiracy Theories, Myths and Legends


Hi #Treksters, I know it's been a quite awhile since I last wrote a blog post...and we've released our next episode. Before I go any further I just want to explain all the Real Life reasons why this has happened.

Granddad 'Sarge' Eric
Obviously for me personally a large contributing factor for this was the passing away of my Granddad 'Sarge' Eric, which left me feeling very 'lost'.
Another reason why this has happened is that collectively as a group we've got two Weddings coming up...one of which is Phil's Wedding.
Which has taken up a large proportion of Phil's life due to it's subsequent planning.


Along those lines we've also had Phil's Stag Do down in Somerset, all in all giving us little or no time to record any podcasts lately.


So in order to give you your much needed The Engage Podcast Fix I have decided to write a post about a set of topics which both interests me and intrigues me....Conspiracy Theories, Myths and Legends!

In this blog post I will be explaining the Conspiracy Theories surrounding famous events, which may or may not have been staged!
With each event I will be giving my opinion on it's accompanying Conspiracy Theory, Myth or Legend whilst trying to ascertain how plausible they are.
If they are (in my opinion) implausible...then I will rule that they have been debunked.

 
As you'll expect everyone will have they're own opinion on this particular issue, but until a Conspiracy Theory, Myth or Legend is solved or debunked...then I think it's only right to speculate over what the truth is.
The Loch Ness Monster
 
Colonel R. K. Wilson's original picture taken in 1934


The Loch Ness Monster is one of the most famous Myths the world has forever been spellbound by.
"Nessie" as it is more commonly known (since 1940's) is said to be the last of the plesiosaurs, living in the depths of Loch Ness up in Scotland.


A CGI graphic of a Plesiosaur
Although all the evidence for "Nessie's" existence is anecdotal...the monster has been captured over the years in pictures, most famously in 1934. When a Colonel R. K. Wilson took a picture, whilst he was on a family holiday up in Scotland.
So much interest has been created in finding "Nessie" that in 1961 the Loch Ness Phenomena Investigation Bureau was set up in order to catch glimpses of the Loch Ness Monster. The Myth of "Nessie" has also been responsible for creating a tourist attraction out of just another 'everyday Scottish loch'...giving a welcome boost to the local (and Scottish) economy!

The Myth of a Loch Ness Monster has done a great deal for Scotland, drawing tourists in yearly with the chance to catch of the famous Loch dwelling monster...but I think it is all in vein.


Diagram of the Wilson family hoax model
As the majority of pictures taken of "Nessie" have ended up being hoaxes.
Unfortunately a prime example of this, is most famous picture of them all the 'Wilson picture'...as it turns out that the Wilson family had modified a toy submarine with a model head and rigged it to appear to be a monster (from a distance).

With technology improving all the time, it is getting easier to 'create pictures featuring "Nessie". Giving no believers an argument not to believe in "Nessie's" existence.
The "Nessie" devotees will see it as an advantage because it will give them an opportunity to monitor for "Nessie" around the clock.
Although... 'if' we ever get a 'real' picture of "Nessie" we won't believe due to the cynical and suspicious world we live in. The other issue people will have is the number of fakes surrounding The Loch Ness Monster Myth.
For me, this is a Myth I would love to believe in but...nothing adds up, as the whole Myth sounds like a Fairy Tale!
  1. Firstly, how on earth is a Plesiosaur meant to survive for so long without being seen, it's for the better word...impossible!
  2. Secondly, A Myth of a prehistoric dinosaur living in a Scottish Loch is too good to be true, making me speculate that the Myth was orchestrated by a cunning Scottish businessman trying to draw up business for the local area through publicity. 
  3. Thirdly, shouldn't we (Humans) have killed "Nessie" through Global Warming, or by another indirect way?!
So it's for those reasons why I have to (at least in my mind) debunk this Myth of a Loch Ness Monster.

The Bermuda Triangle 

Bermuda Triangle location map
The Bermuda Triangle is an area of the Atlantic Ocean which is famous for planes and ships vanishing in thin air...eerily never to be seen again!
Although the area of the pheromone varies between 1,300,000 to 3,900,000 km2 (500,000 to 1,510,000 square miles) depending on what source you use.
That being said it is widely accepted that it lies between Bermuda (in the North), Miami (in the West) and Puerto Rico (in the South).

Four TBF/TBM Avengers flying in formation
In the air, The Bermuda Triangle is most famous for the loss of Flight 19. A training flight of five TBF/TBM Avenger torpedo bombers that disappeared on the 5th of December 1945. After losing radio contact with Fort Lauderdale (their base).
Whilst on the ocean, The Bermuda Triangle is well known for the disappearance of the USS Cyclops (AC-4). Which caused the loss of 309 passengers and crew.

USS Cyclops (AC-4)
Both examples give's you a small impression of just how many countless lives have been lost in one way or another due to The Bermuda Triangle.
There are many different theories for what causes the disappearances in The Bermuda Triangle, ranging from magnetic anomalies to devastating power crystals lying on the seabed.
Many 'solve' either a air disappearance or a sea disappearance...but in my mind (at least) the cause for both air and sea disappearances has to be some overwhelming cause. Which is currently undetectable through current technology.
In my opinion, until we attain the right level of technological development we will never be able to solve the mystery of The Bermuda Triangle.
 
RMS Titanic
 

The RMS Titanic was a 19th Century passenger liner that sank in the North Atlantic Ocean (south-east of Newfoundland).
On the morning of April 15th 1912 after colliding with an iceberg during her maiden voyage from Southampton (United Kingdom) to New York City (United States) via Cherbourg (France) and Queenstown (Ireland).
It laid undiscovered until a Franco-American expedition led by the noted oceanographer Robert Ballard found the wreck in 1985.
Although Conspiracy Theorists believe that the wreck lying at the bottom of the Atlantic isn't that of the Titanic...but is instead it's (older) sister ship RMS Olympic.
They believe that the ships "swapped identities" after the Olympic collided with a naval vessel (HMS Hawke) on it's fifth voyage (on the 20th September 1911) and had to be taken back to Belfast for repairs. During the same time the Titanic is nearing completion (being outfitted) close to the RMS Olympic.
Giving White Star Line the prefect opportunity to do the worlds largest sleight of hand trick. The only reason they would do this, is because the White Star Line were in financial difficulties at the time.
Leaving White Star Line only one way to survive...insurance fraud.
By switching ships, and by tricking everyone into believing that the damaged Olympic was in fact the Titanic. Meant that they could get a full insurance pay-out for the 'new ships' loss. Solving White Star Line's money woes.
 

For me I think there's points you can believe on both sides. The Conspiracy Theorists have some interesting idea's about what happened...but I think there's no way they (White Star Line) could have kept it secret! Making me think it's a work of fiction.
Although this fiction fits some of the pieces together making it a plausible Conspiracy Theory. Which is why I would recommend watching the documentary above to make up your own mind up about it all!
 

So it's my opinion that it is the RMS Titanic that sunk on the 15th of April 1912. Meaning that I have to debunk this very plausible Conspiracy Theory.

I also think that the story and legacy are more important than the facts and figures behind the events on the Titanic.
Because of this event, worldwide legislation came in making it customary for ships to have enough lifeboats for everyone on board through the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS) passed in 1914.
The Titanic (and later SOLAS) lead to the formation of the International Ice Patrol, responsible for monitoring icebergs in the Artic and Oceans and the Atlantic Ocean. After reporting that information onto ships 'for safety purposes'. Which reading between the lines...means minimising the chances of an sinking occurring!


Belfast City Hall RMS Titanic Memorial
That being said, I think that the name of the ship is irrelevant...because whatever the truth is, through either that of design or by an accident.
A White Star Line Olympic class ocean liner is sitting at the bottom of the North Atlantic Ocean after causing the deaths of 1,500 people. So we need to make sure that we preserve the memory of all the people on board.
Who we should never forget!

The Moon Landings


The last Conspiracy Theory I'm going to discuss is the big one...the Moon Landings from 1969-1972.

On the 20th July 1969, Apollo 11 landed on the Moon....a day later astronauts Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin (along with Michael Collins up in the Command Module) were the first humans to walk on the Moon.

U.S. President John F. Kennedy giving his speech to the U.S. Congress in 1961
Eight years after U.S. President John F. Kennedy vowed in a U.S. Congress speech that "before this decade is out, of landing a man on the Moon and returning him safely to the Earth".
Not only did the United States achieve his goal once...but on six separate occasions in a three year period.

Apollo 11 Astronauts (Buzz Aldrin and Neil Armstrong) in a NASA training mock-up of the Moon and Luna Module
Although there are a lot of people out there that believe that man has never stepped on the Moon, as they think it was all staged.
The main points of contention for Conspiracy Theorists are:
  1. The lack of stars visible in the Lunar sky.
  2. Visible "camera crosshairs".   
  3. Aberrant shadows.
  4. The Stars and Stripes flag "ruffled" by air currents.

All of the points of contention have logical sound explanations.
  1. There is a lack of stars visible in the Lunar sky, because all the Moon landing occurred during the Lunar daytime...making it impossible to see the stars due to the immense power of the sun.

    Which meant that their camera's couldn't pick up the stars either, as they were set to a daylight exposure.
  2. Visible "camera crosshairs" are a typical sight on the Apollo missions, as the cameras they used had a reseau plate (a clear glass plate with crosshairs etched on).
    Which made it impossible for any photographed object to appear "in front" of the grid. The only way an object would appear "behind" of the grid is in post production. So that it would appear that the Moon landing have been faked.
    This would was quite normal, as people wanted images of the great achievement...but didn't want the "camera crosshairs" spoiling their image. After sometime these 'edited' copies circulated, and became the preferred images of the Apollo missions.
  3. Shadows on the Moon are complicated by reflected light, uneven ground, wide-angle lens distortion, and lunar dust.
    Light appears from several different sources: the Sun, sunlight reflected from the Earth, sunlight reflected from the Moon's surface, and sunlight reflected from the astronauts and the Lunar Module.
    Light from these sources is scattered by the lunar dust in many directions...which includes shadows.
    Shadows falling into craters and hills may appear longer, shorter and distorted. Causing shadows to display properties of a vanishing point perspective, making them converge to a point on the horizon.
    This theory (and many others) were famously debunked by MythBusters episode "NASA Moon Landing".

  4. The flag was fastened to a Г-shaped rod (called the Lunar Flag Assembly) so that it didn't hang down.
    The flag only seemed to "ruffle" when the astronauts were moving it into position.
    Without air drag, these movements caused the free corner of the flag to swing like a pendulum for some time.
    The flag was rippled because it had been folded during storage, so the ripples could be mistaken for movement in a still photo. Video's have shown that when the astronauts let go of the flagpole vibrated briefly...but then remains still.
    This theory was also debunked on the MythBusters episode "NASA Moon Landing".
To see the logical sound explanations in full please go to:
Moon landing conspiracy theories- The hoax claims

I believe that we have (without a doubt) landed on the Moon between 1969-1972. For another few reasons.
Including, the fact that I don't personally believe that U.S. President John F. Kennedy would condone 'staging' the entire Apollo missions.
Due to the massive undertaking (and loss) in getting humans to our nearest neighbour. You don't build all that infrastructure (including six Saturn V rockets) just for the sake of a conspiracy!

 A picture taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter of the Apollo 17 landing site
You've also got to remember that they took an awful lot of equipment up with them...most they would have to leave behind, and as there's a vacuum up there it's going to be just where the astronauts left them during the Apollo missions.

Apollo 11's retroreflector  (with it's protective cover)
Part of that equipment, which can without any doubt prove we've been there six times are the Retroreflectors (mirrors used as targets for Earth-based tracking lasers) from the Laser Ranging Retroreflector Experiment (LRRR).

The United Kingdom's Goodwill Moon rock given in 1970 by U.S. President Richard Nixon
There's also the matter of the Goodwill Moon rocks given to 135 countries and 50 US states in 1970 by U.S. president Richard Nixon. Each Goodwill Moon rock was samples of moon rock obtained during the Apollo 11 mission.
If we are to believe the Conspiracy Theorists that the Apollo missions were faked...then the same would be true with Goodwill Moon rocks.

I know I'm going to exaggerate it here...but do they really want us to believe that they are rocks found at the bottom of the White House garden?! 

I put this to you Conspiracy Theorists directly, isn't it for once nice to believe that those 185 Goodwill Moon rock samples have come the 476,527 miles (766,895.8683km) from the Moon...with the help of human beings?!

I hope you've enjoyed reading it, and I hope that I've given you something to think about.

This is Simon from The Engage Podcast signing out!